In the aftermath of the recent shooting on Parliament Hill and loss of Canadian Armed Forces soldiers there and in Quebec, the Canadian Consortium for Research extends its thoughts to those impacted by these tragic events.

In the aftermath of the recent shooting on Parliament Hill and loss of Canadian Armed Forces soldiers there and in Quebec, the Canadian Consortium for Research extends its thoughts to those impacted by these tragic events.

August 2014: CCR Pre-Budget Submission

Ottawa, August 2014 –

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
With 19 member organizations, the Canadian Consortium for Research (CCR) represents more than
50,000 researchers and 500,000 students across disciplines (http://en.ccr-ccr.ca/). In this capacity, it is the
largest advocacy coalition in Canada, focusing on research funding in all disciplines and support for post-secondary education.

The CCR recognizes that the federal government has continued to make investments in research
infrastructures, internships, as well as in Canada’s federal granting councils in past years. We look
forward to further details about the Canada First Research Excellence Fund, which we anticipate will be
accessible to all post-secondary institutions across Canada, based on a peer-review process by the
research community.

We appreciate that in a time of fiscal constraint, increases in research funding may have been seen as
challenging; necessitating a number of years of austerity for the research community, particularly
individual researchers who have seen base funding for the granting councils decrease when adjusted for
inflation. As we enter a surplus budget, increased investments in core funding for research, students and
infrastructure are required to ensure program growth and to position Canada competitively in the
international research landscape.

These investments will contribute to more and better-paying jobs, new inventions and patents, increased
productivity, increased government revenues over the medium- to long-term and an increased standard
of living for Canadians. They will also help to secure Canada’s place as an international work destination
for the next generation of researchers. For these reasons, the CCR submits the following
recommendations for further investments in these areas as part of the 2015 Budget:

  • Recommendation #1: That the government continue to increase the base budgets for the granting
    councils and the Indirect Cost of Research program at levels that compensate for the effects of
    current and past inflation, including increases in costs associated with infrastructure and research
    personnel, and restore Canada’s international competitiveness, measured as a percentage of GDP.
    Cost: $150 million per year.
  • Recommendation #2: Increased support for students through graduate scholarships, full-time
    internships and post-graduate training, across a diversity of disciplines and settings, particularly high demand
    fields. Cost: $35 million per year.
  • Recommendation #3: Invest in various building blocks of Canada’s national research capacity and public science that support research conducted both within and outside of academic settings. Cost: $20 million per year.
  • The CCR’s recommendations address four of the six key themes identified by the House of Commons
    Standing Committee on Finance:

  • Theme 2: Supporting families and helping vulnerable Canadians by focusing on health, education and training
  • Theme 3: Increasing the competitiveness of Canadian businesses through research, development, innovation and commercialization
  • Theme 4: Ensuring prosperous and secure communities, including through support for infrastructure
  • Theme 6: Maximizing the number and types of jobs for Canadians
  • Click here for the full submission: CCR_pre-budget_submission_July2014_v10_Final.pdf

    June 6, 2014: Pre-Budget Consultation for the 2015 Federal Budget is Open. Deadline for Written Submissions is August 6, 2014.

    Ottawa, June 06, 2014 –

    The House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance has launched its pre-budget consultation process, and is inviting Canadians to participate. A report on the 2014 consultations will be tabled in the House of Commons prior to the December 2014 parliamentary adjournment. Suggestions made by Canadians and the pre-budget report compiled by the Committee will be considered by the Minister of Finance in the development of the 2015 federal budget.

    “I am very pleased to be announcing the 2014 pre-budget consultations,” said Mr. James Rajotte, M.P. for Edmonton-Leduc and Chair of the House Finance Committee. “The Committee encourages the input of Canadians in this process, and invites individuals to provide a written submission with their proposals for the forthcoming budget.”

    Click here for the full announcement.

    CCR Budget Response, February 2014

    News Release:

    Budget 2014 introduces new funding for research, but more needs to be done.

    For immediate release: February 12, 2014 –

    OTTAWA— The Canadian Consortium for Research (CCR) welcomes research funding in Budget 2014, some of which support CCR’s key recommendations. The CCR recommended increased investments in basic research, support for students through graduate scholarships and internships, and support for Canada’s knowledge infrastructure.

    “We are pleased to see some support for our recommendations in Budget 2014. However, this money is really just the bare minimum required to maintain existing funding for the granting councils and TRIUMF,” says Canadian Consortium for Research Chair, Dr. Lisa Votta-Bleeker.

    The $46 million per annum to support advanced research, scientific discoveries, and indirect costs maintains current granting council base funding when adjusted for inflation. “Positively, the new funds for NSERC and SSHRC can be put toward discovery-based research in contrast to the past two federal budgets,” says Dr. Votta-Bleeker.

    This budget introduces a Canada First Research Excellence Fund that promises over $1 billion in funding over the next decade. The CCR expects this program will provide research support to all post-secondary institutions and researchers across Canada, and awaits further details.

    Budget 2014 includes support for full-time internships for post-secondary education graduates in high-demand fields. While the CCR is pleased to see some investment in internships, it is insufficient to meet current student needs. The Budget does not include any new funding to address the shortfall in Canada’s graduate scholarships nor does it contain any new financial assistance to address student debt.

    The CCR is disappointed that its recommendation to support knowledge infrastructure for Statistics Canada and Library Archives Canada was not addressed in Budget 2014. These key institutions must be strengthened as the federal government returns to fiscal balance next year.

    Budget 2014 announces funds for TRIUMF, Quantum Computing and the Open Data Institute. The CCR welcomes these funds, but these are insufficient to maintain current levels of operation for TRIUMF when accounting for inflation. As a minimum, all of Canada’s research institutes and laboratories require stable inflation-adjusted funds to continue. New investment is required for program growth and to remain competitive internationally.


    The CCR is the largest advocacy coalition in Canada, focusing on research funding in all disciplines and support for post-secondary education. CCR includes 19 organizations that represent more than 50,000 researchers and 500,000 students across disciplines.

    For more information:
    Dr. Lisa Votta-Bleeker
    Chair, Canadian Consortium for Research
    executiveoffice@cpa.ca or 613-237-2144 ext. 323

    CCR_BudgetResponses_Feb2014_Final.pdf

    CCR Responds to Industry Canada Consultation on Science, Technology and Innovation Agenda.

    Industry Canada recently sought input from Canada’s scientific community on its Science, Technology and Innovation Agenda. Questions for which the government sought input included:

    1. How can Canada continue to develop, attract and retain the world’s top research talent at our businesses, research institutions, colleges and polytechnics, and universities?
    2. What actions could be taken, by the government or others, to enhance the mobilization of knowledge and technology from government laboratories and universities, colleges and polytechnics to the private sector?
    3. Building on the advice provided by the Expert Panel on Federal Support for Research and Development, what more can be done to improve business investment in R&D and innovation?
    4. How might Canada build upon its success as a world leader in discovery-driven research?
    5. Is the Government of Canada’s suite of programs appropriately designed to best support research excellence?

    Click here to view the CCR’s submission.

    CCR Breakfast with Canada’s Funding Agencies

    The CCR hosted its second annual breakfast with Canada’s funding agencies on December 4th, 2013.

    In attendance at the breakfast were:

    • Mr. Pierre Charest, Associate Vice-President, Corporate Planning and Policy, NSERC
    • Dr. Jane Aubin, Chief Scientific Officer/Vice-President of Research, CIHR
    • Dr. Rob Annan, Vice President, Research and Policy, MITACS
    • Dr. Ted Hewitt, Executive Vice-President, SSHRC
    • Dr. Gilles Patry, CEO and President, Canadian Foundation for Innovation

    House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance – Pre-budget Consultations 2013

    This Brief Is Submitted By:          

    Canadian Consortium for Research

    Topic:   

    Innovation and commercialization

    Recommendation 1: Please provide a short summary of your recommendation.

    The Canadian government must continue its investment in programs and initiatives that create quality jobs and lay the foundations for the long-term economic, social and cultural development of Canada. The CCR recommends that the Government of Canada invest an additional $150 million in base funding for basic research through SSHRC, NSERC, and CIHR for each of the next three years. Investing in independent peer-review research will serve the public interest by advancing knowledge and innovation, which facilitates the current economic recovery underway and assures Canada’s long-term prosperity.

    Expected cost or savings: From the pull-down menus, please indicate the expected cost or savings of your recommendation to the federal government and the period of time to which the expected cost or savings is related.

                    $100 million – $499.9 million

                    3 years

     Federal funding: Please provide a precise indication of how the federal government could fund your recommendation. For example, indicate what federal spending should be reallocated, what federal tax measure(s) should be introduced, eliminated or changed, etc.

    Making this investment will contribute to quality jobs, new inventions and patents, boost productivity, and increase government revenues over the medium- to long-term.  In addition, the government can rationalize the procurement function further. These savings can create ample fiscal room to fund the three recommendations in this submission.

    Intended beneficiaries: Please indicate the groups of individuals, the sector(s) and/or the regions that would benefit by implementation of your recommendation.

    Investments in universities and colleges across Canada will help Canadians pursue and complete higher studies and acquire new skills. These investments will also foster the next generation of researchers who will tackle the many economic, social, and cultural challenges, as a key role of basic research is precisely to educate, inspire, and unleash the creativity of the next generation of researchers and their ability to make groundbreaking discoveries. Investing in Canadian researchers will boost the number of PhD graduates, which is still alarmingly low when compared to peer countries.

    General impacts: Depending on the nature of your recommendation, please indicate how the standard of living of Canadians would be improved, jobs would be created, people would be trained, etc.

    Historically, the “payoffs” of basic research have been many: unanticipated innovations as a result of basic research include the discovery of X-rays, nylon, Teflon, GPS technology, informatics, superconductivity and medical imaging. It is widely recognized that investments in basic research will create more and better-paying jobs, boost productivity, and increase the standard of living for Canadians. As Mike Lazaridis said in a speech at the Perimeter Institute “What we need are those creative people to be left to do creative things… this is the raw material for industry to capitalize”.

    Topic:

                    Education and Skills Training

    Recommendation 2: Please provide a short summary of your recommendation.

    The CCR recommends an additional investment in core funding of $30 million per year to expand graduate scholarships and internships. Expanding the Canada Graduate Scholarships by $25 million would fund an additional 1,250 students. Increasing internship initiatives by $5 million so that graduate students can intern with not-for-profit organizations would fund an additional 125 internships per year. Supporting graduate-level teaching, research, and experience is critical to build a foundation for economic and social development, while highly skilled and trained workers drive innovation.

    Expected cost or savings: From the pull-down menus, please indicate the expected cost or savings of your recommendation to the federal government and the period of time to which the expected cost or savings is related.

                    $10 million – $99.9 million

                    3 years

    Federal funding: Please provide a precise indication of how the federal government could fund your recommendation. For example, indicate what federal spending should be reallocated, what federal tax measure(s) should be introduced, eliminated or changed, etc.

    Making this investment will contribute to the creation of quality jobs, new inventions and patents, boost productivity, and increase government revenues over the medium- to long-term. In addition, the government can rationalize the procurement function further. These savings can create ample fiscal room to fund the three recommendations in this submission.

    Intended beneficiaries: Please indicate the groups of individuals, the sector(s) and/or the regions that would benefit by implementation of your recommendation.

    The prospect of lower student debt encourages Canadians to pursue graduate-level education, while real-world experience will help them find meaningful research jobs or other high-quality employment. These investments are particularly important for key industry sectors as Canada’s rate of private-sector innovation continues to lag behind that of comparable countries. Particular regions that would benefit from increased funding  include Atlantic Canada, southwestern Ontario, and Saskatchewan where growing high-tech centres require more employees with graduate-level skills and training.

     

    General impacts: Depending on the nature of your recommendation, please indicate how the standard of living of Canadians would be improved, jobs would be created, people would be trained, etc.

    Increased funding for graduate scholarships and internships benefits Canadians and employers across Canada and establishes stable, well-paid employment and boosts economic growth. The broad impacts are better jobs and higher productivity, while investing in doctoral students especially will help close the gap in graduation rates vis-à-vis those in peer countries. Better-funded graduates are also less likely to have student debt, making them more able to contribute economically.

     

    Topic:  

                    Infrastructure

    Recommendation 3: Please provide a short summary of your recommendation.

    The CCR recommends the government invest an additional $20 million in base funding per year over the next three years to support two key building blocks of Canada’s national research infrastructure. The CCR proposes an increase of $10 million in funding for Library and Archives Canada (LAC) and $10 million for Statistics Canada. This investment will enhance LAC’s capacity to collect and preserve the country’s rich documentary heritage, while investing in Canada’s internationally renowned data collection agency furthers researchers’ ability to generate reliable knowledge and inform policy.

    Expected cost or savings: From the pull-down menus, please indicate the expected cost or savings of your recommendation to the federal government and the period of time to which the expected cost or savings is related.

                    $10 million – $99.9 million

                    3 years

     

    Federal funding: Please provide a precise indication of how the federal government could fund your recommendation. For example, indicate what federal spending should be reallocated, what federal tax measure(s) should be introduced, eliminated or changed, etc.

    Making this investment will contribute to the creation of quality jobs, new inventions and patents, boost productivity, and increase government revenues over the medium- to long-term.  In addition, the government can rationalize the procurement function further. These savings can create ample fiscal room to fund the three recommendations in this submission.

    Intended beneficiaries: Please indicate the groups of individuals, the sector(s) and/or the regions that would benefit by implementation of your recommendation.

    Researchers, graduate students, policy makers, historians, genealogists, Aboriginal communities, and the general public benefit from the important artistic, historical, and cultural heritage collected and made available by Library and Archives Canada. Statistics Canada’s surveys are crucial not only to the research community and enhance researchers’ work, but government, industry, business, not-for-profits, municipalities and communities depend on these surveys to develop reliable, informed decisions and policies.

     

    General impacts: Depending on the nature of your recommendation, please indicate how the standard of living of Canadians would be improved, jobs would be created, people would be trained, etc.

    Investing in Canada’s national research infrastructure is key to the country’s prosperity and standard of living. Investing in Library and Archives Canada (LAC) and Statistics Canada lays the foundation for the creation of all kinds of research in a variety of fields and for many sectors, leading to broad economic, social, and environmental benefits. Investing in LAC   creates broad beneficial impacts as Canadians can discover their history, particularly as LAC seeks to make more of its documentary heritage available on-line to all citizens.

    Please use this page if you wish to provide more explanation about your recommendation(s).

    The Canadian Consortium for Research (CCR) is the largest umbrella advocacy organization in Canada whose primary concerns are the funding of research in all disciplines and support for post-secondary education. CCR (http://en.ccr-ccr.ca/) consists of 18 organizations that represent more than 50,000 researchers and 500,000 students in a wide range of disciplines across Canada.

     

    The CCR recommends the government invests for each of the next three years: 1) $150 million in base funding to increase investments in basic research through Canada’s granting councils; 2) an additional $30 million in graduate student funding in the form of scholarships and internships; and 3) an increase of $20 million in core funding divided equally between Library and Archives Canada and Statistics Canada.

     

    A key role of basic research is to educate, inspire, and unleash the creativity of the next generation of researchers and their ability to make groundbreaking discoveries. By doing so, we make a vital long-term contribution to our future creative capacity and assure Canada’s future prosperity. Relative to our population, however, Canada produces significantly fewer graduates at the crucial doctoral level than peer countries.

     

    Canada’s granting councils are widely admired internationally and form the bedrock of support for basic research in Canada. Yet very many researchers rated highly by international standards of excellence still cannot be funded; in health research for example, only about 20% of such researchers are typically funded.  Increased investments in basic, medical research will improve explorations of illness and prevention, which is crucial as Canada’s population ages. Finally, implementing open access policies would enable wider dissemination of Canadian research.

     

    Facing significant burdens of high tuition fees and rising debt loads, additional scholarship and internship funding is key for Canada’s graduate students as they seek to complete their studies in a timely fashion and make the transition into the labour market. Canada’s continued high youth unemployment rates necessitate a more robust active labour market policy.

     

    Investing in Canada’s national research infrastructure is key to the country’s prosperity and standard of living. Additional funding for Library and Archives Canada is crucial to ensure the vitality of its collections and its ability to make its materials accessible. Additional funding will also enable LAC’s digitization initiatives as it seeks to make more of its materials available on-line for the benefit of the research community and Canadians across the country. These initiatives are initially very costly but necessary to promote knowledge, innovation, and prosperity. Canada’s statistical agency is similarly a cornerstone institution which generates fundamental and reliable knowledge so that informed and evidence-based policy decisions can be taken for the benefit of Canadians across the country in small and large communities.

    CCR submission to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance – 31 July 2013.PDF

    Submission to the 2011 Federal Budget Consultations

    Recommendations
    1.      The Granting Councils are the best mechanism to fund basic (curiosity-driven) research in Canada.  While funding for the Councils’ targeted programs has increased significantly in recent years, the consensus among our community and our partners in every sector is that increased support for basic research is also essential to a healthy national innovation capacity.  Recognizing this, Budget 2010 did increase the Councils’ funding for basic research — a small but much appreciated increase.  Much more remains to be done, however, particularly given that the cuts to the Councils mandated in 2009 will reduce their budgets by $87M p.a. in 2011-12 and beyond. CCR therefore recommends:
     That the federal government augment the basic (curiosity-driven) research portion of the Granting Councils’ budgets by 5%.

    2.     A key role of basic research is to educate, inspire, and unleash the creativity of the next generation of highly qualified people.  Relative to our population, however, Canada produces 35% fewer graduates at the crucial doctoral level than the OECD average or the U.S.10  This has been recognized by the federal government with the creation of, for example, the Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarships.  CCR therefore recommends:
     That additional graduate level scholarship programs be developed and sustained over the long term to support emerging researchers, as current stimulus programs expire.
    3.    Adding at least 40% to the direct costs of conducting research in Canada, indirect costs29 are reimbursed by the federal Indirect Costs Program at only about 25%.30  The shortfall is borne by the research institutions, forcing them to forego other investments that would improve the quality of teaching and research.  The U.S., U.K. and the EU recognize the impact of such a burden and reimburse 40-60% of the direct costs of research.  Maintaining world-class research infrastructures and facilities in Canada requires increased support to cover these costs.  However, CCR recognizes the current financial situation and therefore recommends:
       That the funding for the indirect costs of university research rise over the course of the next 5 years to represent 40 percent of the direct costs funded by the granting councils.

    Name: Paul S. Vincett – Chairperson
    2010-08-16